![]() ![]() > Anyway, collaborating with the packagers to improve packages and avoid Troubles in the first place is of course the best, yet time-costly.įrom stephen at Wed May 16 10:45:23 2012 Kinda like having that specific entry in the FAQ moved to the top,Īnyway, collaborating with the packagers to improve packages and avoid Want to read this, read your distro's docs instead". However, you could leave this note toĪnyone : "If you installed from a distro packege, you probably don't That the mailman installation is on a server which is not the machine ![]() Regarding this specific item, you shouldn't bother : there are chances > want to read this, read your distro's docs instead" warnings!) > Red Hat/Fedora hosted browsers and display big "You probably don't > (including our own - our web pages should detect Debian/Ubuntu and Want to read this, read your distro's docs instead" warnings!)įrom jerome at Wed May 16 09:44:52 2012įrom: jerome at (=?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me?=) Red Hat/Fedora hosted browsers and display big "You probably don't (including our own - our web pages should detect Debian/Ubuntu and Installation caveats that are displayed). Package (for example, their debconf procedures and the post. Reminded") should go talk to them, and suggest improvements to the Or maybe we (= me FVO me in "sometime in the summer *if* I'm Rarely even look for it, creature of habit (or lack thereof) that I > don't look at the Debian documentation. > aliases and postfix_to_mailman.py in incompatible ways, people > have ended up with some Postfix configuration that combines Mailman > users who come to this list with mail delivery issues because they > but evidently, judging from the number of Debian/Ubuntu packge :-) When the distro package works, it *is* good. Subject: Ubuntu release of Mailmanīe fair, Mark. ![]() post-data="adminpw=foobar&send_unsub_notifications_to_list_owner=0&send_unsub_ack_to_this_batch=0&unsubscribees=me at "įrom stephen at Wed May 16 09:27:40 2012įrom: stephen at (Stephen J. Script assumes there are values for the check boxes on the form. That probably also means you don't haveĪccess to Mailman's error log to provide the traceback, however, I can It appears that you don't have command line access to Mailman, so theīin/remove_members -fromall user at >go through the clumsy web interface for each of the mailing lists? >user from a couple of mailing lists at the same time without having to >and now I'm lost :-\ Can somebody help me? How can I unsubscribe a given >explicitly inhibited, but the webmaster can find this information in the Printing of traceback and other system information has been >wget -post-data="adminpw=foobar&unsubscribees=me at " >Now, I'm not super sure I got the command Subject: unsubscribe one user from many lists San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. In the web admin interface, set Archiving Options -> archive_private to >e-mails/group, so that others can not read them? At this way, any one can >by/from Google and other search engines. >Emails from a group in my "Basic Mailing List 'can be found and read Subject: Basic Mailing Lists vulnerable ? Your help is greatly appreciated - thank you very much!įrom mark at Wed May 16 08:22:33 2012 Go through the clumsy web interface for each of the mailing lists? User from a couple of mailing lists at the same time without having to ![]() Printing of traceback and other system information has beenĮxplicitly inhibited, but the webmaster can find this information in theĪnd now I'm lost :-\ Can somebody help me? How can I unsubscribe a given Please inform the webmaster for this site of this ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |